· Various levels of self-presentation and self-disclosure were used to examine how they impacted people’s favorability to certain online dating profiles, particularly on the AdCompare and Try the Best 10 Online - Personal Dating Sites Free! Verified Dating Websites. Find Likeminded Singles. Start Dating Now! AdCompare Online Dating Sites, Join the Right Site For You & Meet Singles Online! Compare Dating Sites with Genuine Profiles. Meet Local Singles & Find Your MatchTypes: Christian Dating · Senior Dating · All Ages Dating Sites · Gay Dating Sites disclosure and self-efficacy in an online dating environment. This research study. examines the way self-disclosure, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and gender interrelate in an. online dating Author: Andrew Christopher España One may view self-disclosure as forms of conversation while trying to get to know someone. In the online dating field self-disclosure is key in communication. In online dating the only way ... read more
Export CSV RefMan EndNote BibTex RefWorks. Online dating -- Research -- Social aspects, Self-efficacy -- Sex differences, Self-disclosure -- Sex differences, Self-esteem -- Sex differences. This study explores online dating by studying the relationship between self-disclosure and self-efficacy in an online dating environment. This research study examines the way self-disclosure, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and gender interrelate in an online dating environment. This study includes, but is not limited to, discussion of the type of correlation between self-efficacy and self-esteem, the relationship between self-disclosure and self-efficacy, and the differences between men's and women's self-disclosure in an online dating environment.
From conducting this study, the researcher was able to determine that there is a statistically significant relationship between gender and how it relates to self-disclosure and self-efficacy. With the results from the study, the understanding of how different variables relate to online dating and romantic relationships has been taken one step further as it helps fill the gap in the literature.
In Copyright. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder s. España, Andrew Christopher, "Self-Disclosure and Self-Efficacy in Online Dating" Dissertations and Theses. Sharing of digital visual media: Privacy concerns and trust among young people. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40 2 , — Download references.
Department of Communication Studies, MIOS, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. De Backer. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Department of Communication Sciences, IMEC-MICT, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Reprints and Permissions. Hallam, L.
Information Disclosure, Trust and Health Risks in Online Dating. In: Walrave, M. eds Sexting. Palgrave Studies in Cyberpsychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Published : 20 March Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Print ISBN : Online ISBN : eBook Packages : Behavioral Science and Psychology Behavioral Science and Psychology R0. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content. Search SpringerLink Search. Abstract Online dating is characterized by computer-mediated communication CMC with a lessened availability of physical context cues, limiting online daters to nonverbally express themselves.
Keywords Online dating Romantic relations Cues-filtered-in approach Cues-filtered-out approach. Buying options Chapter USD eBook USD Softcover Book USD Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout Buy Softcover Book.
Hardcover Book USD Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout Buy Hardcover Book. Learn about institutional subscriptions. References Altman, I. Google Scholar Anderson, T. CrossRef Google Scholar Antheunis, M. CrossRef Google Scholar Baker, A. CrossRef Google Scholar Bargh, J. CrossRef Google Scholar Benotsch, E. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Berger, C. CrossRef Google Scholar Best, K.
CrossRef Google Scholar Blackhart, G. CrossRef Google Scholar Breakwell, G. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Cali, B. CrossRef Google Scholar Cheshire, C. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Couch, D. CrossRef Google Scholar Culnan, M. Google Scholar Day, T. CrossRef Google Scholar Derlega, V. Google Scholar Donn, J. CrossRef Google Scholar Ellison, N. CrossRef Google Scholar Farrer, J. CrossRef Google Scholar Finkel, E. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Gibbs, J.
CrossRef Google Scholar Gibbs, J. CrossRef Google Scholar Goffman, E. Google Scholar Guadagno, R. CrossRef Google Scholar Hancock, J. CrossRef Google Scholar Hasinoff, A. Google Scholar Hollenbaugh, E. CrossRef Google Scholar Kang, T. CrossRef Google Scholar Larzelere, R. CrossRef Google Scholar Lawson, H. CrossRef Google Scholar Lo, S. CrossRef Google Scholar McKenna, K.
CrossRef Google Scholar Mitchell, K. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Peterson-Iyer, K. CrossRef Google Scholar Rege, A. Google Scholar Reinecke, L. CrossRef Google Scholar Rosen, L. CrossRef Google Scholar Rostosky, S. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Rubin, Z. CrossRef Google Scholar Schouten, A. CrossRef Google Scholar Siibak, A. Google Scholar Smith, A. Google Scholar Sproull, L. CrossRef Google Scholar Steiner, P. Google Scholar Suler, J. CrossRef Google Scholar Tidwell, L. CrossRef Google Scholar Toma, C.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Van Ouytsel, J. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Walrave, M. CrossRef Google Scholar Walther, J. Google Scholar Walther, J. CrossRef Google Scholar Ward, J. CrossRef Google Scholar Wildermuth, S. CrossRef Google Scholar Winter, L. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Yurchisin, J. CrossRef Google Scholar Zemmels, D. CrossRef Google Scholar Download references.
De Backer Authors Lara Hallam View author publications. View author publications. Editor information Editors and Affiliations Department of Communication Studies, MIOS, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Prof. Rights and permissions Reprints and Permissions. Copyright information © The Author s. About this chapter.
Cite this chapter Hallam, L.
Empirical studies in western and non-western cultures support the link between self-disclosure and intimacy. However, certain factors may either strengthen or weaken the relationship between online self-disclosure and intimacy. Due to the pervasive nature of information and communication technology ICT and the social media, the present study examined whether online moral foundations can moderate such an established association in an undergraduate student sample in Nigeria.
They completed the following self-report behavioural questionnaire measures: Online Self-Disclosure Questionnaire, Online Moral Foundations Questionnaire, and a modified form of FAP Intimacy Scale. Result showed that self-disclosure was positively associated with intimacy but the relationship of online moral foundations and intimacy was not significant. Online moral foundations significantly moderated the relationship between online self-disclosure and intimacy such that high self-disclosure was associated with greater intimacy for students who reported low and moderate levels of online moral foundations, but not for students with high online moral foundations.
Findings highlight the need to make young people develop a balanced and holistic understanding of morality in order to effectively function in their interpersonal relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution. Rent this article via DeepDyve. Acquisti, A. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, , — Article Google Scholar. Aydogmus, C. Perceptions of transformational leadership and job satisfaction: The roles of personality traits and psychological empowerment.
Bagarozzi, D. Enhancing intimacy in marriage: A clinician's guide. London: Routledge. Baumeister, R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 3 , — Berg, J. Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar. Chastain, R. Self-concealment research and theory: An integrative review. Presented at APA Annual Conference at Washington, DC.
Cheung, C. Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27 4 , — Chukwuorji, J. Different slopes for different folks: Gender moderates the relationship between empathy and narcissism. Current Psychology, First online. Collins, N. Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Constant, E. Attachment orientation and relational intimacy: The mediating role of emotional competences. Current Psychology. Corsano, P. Keeping secrets from friends: Exploring the effects of friendship quality, loneliness and self-esteem on secrecy.
Journal of Adolescence, 58 , 24— Article PubMed Google Scholar. Couch, D. What are the real and perceived risks and dangers of online dating? Perspectives from online daters: Health risks in the media. Derlega, V. Self disclosure.
Newbury Park: Sage. Fallahchai, R. Psychometric properties and factorial validity of the dyadic coping inventory - the Persian version. Current Psychology, 38 , Online First. Gibbs, J. Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in internet dating. Communication Research, 33 2 , — First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating.
Communication Research, 38 1 , 70— Graham, J. Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2 , — Greene, K. Disclosure of chronic illness varies by topic and target: The role of stigma and boundaries in willingness to disclose. Petronio Ed. New York: Psychology Press. Self-disclosure in personal relationships. Perlman Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chapter Google Scholar. Hayes, A. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.
New York: Gullford Press. Hedarics, M. The dimensions of generalized prejudice within the dual-process model: The mediating role of moral foundations. Current Psychology, 37 , Online First.
Heller, P. The process of understanding intimacy: Similarity, understanding, and gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24 3 , Henslin, J. Sociology: A down to earth Approach 9 th ed.
Boston: Pearson International. Horne, R. Gender role attitudes, relationship efficacy, and self-disclosure in intimate relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1 , 37— Ifeagwazi, C. Mediating effect of self-efficacy on attachment styles and intimacy among students.
International Journal of Communication, 13, Jourard, S. An experimental analysis of the transparent self. Canada: Wiley. Jyoti, J. Factors affecting cultural intelligence and its impact on job performance: Role of cross-cultural adjustment, experience and perceived social support. Personnel Review, 46 4 , — Kelly, A. Consequences of revealing personal secrets.
Krcmar, M. Development as an explanation for and predictor of online self-disclosure among Dutch adolescents. Media, 9 2 , — Lane, J. The cognitive consequences of secrecy.
lowed by an investigation of similarities and interests and then personal self-disclosure. Dating usually begins once a week and may accelerate after a time of ‘‘getting to know you’’. In contrast, online dating usually begins with a ﬂurry of e-mail messages back and forth with early self-disclosure by both parties. Once this intimate relationship has been established the process Online dating is now a billion dollar industry and growing (Fiscal Times, ). The current study examines how interpersonal computer-mediated relationships developed through uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure. Online daters may become educated on courting in a computer-mediated environment AdCompare and Try the Best 10 Online - Personal Dating Sites Free! Verified Dating Websites. Find Likeminded Singles. Start Dating Now! Published online dating could be successful, online dating jennifer l rosen; topics: an available dating is unique in a central concept in a therapist. Prior research blackhart et al. For online is a practical application of self-disclosure by nu. Additionally, self-disclosure; exploring disclosure, existing research and forth with a practical application of private information about your age AdCompare and Try the Best 10 Online - Personal Dating Sites Free! Verified Dating Websites. Find Likeminded Singles. Start Dating Now! AdCompare Online Dating Sites, Join the Right Site For You & Meet Singles Online! Compare Dating Sites with Genuine Profiles. Meet Local Singles & Find Your MatchTypes: Christian Dating · Senior Dating · All Ages Dating Sites · Gay Dating Sites ... read more